MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412328827

Exit-beskatning af selskaber:– ny dom fra EU-Domstolen nødvendiggør ændring af danske regler

2012· article· da· W4412328827 on OpenAlexaff
Søren Hansen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEU Law and Policy Analysis
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artiklen foretager med udgangspunkt i EU Domstolens afgørelse i sagen Kommissionen mod Portugal, C-38/10, en overordnet analyse af de krav, som EU-rettens bestemmelser om fri bevægelighed opstiller i forhold til nationale regler om exit-beskatning af selskaber. Det konkluderes, at medlemsstaterne generelt vil have mulighed for at beskatte selskaber, der flytter til en anden medlemsstat, men at der vil være visse væsentlige begrænsninger for udformningen og anvendelsen af regler om exit-beskatning. Artiklen fokuserer herefter på de danske regler om exit-beskatning og vurderer på baggrund heraf, om Domstolens afgørelse vil have betydning for de danske regler. Det konkluderes i den forbindelse, at de danske regler i den nuværende form ikke kan opretholdes, og at der derfor er behov for at foretage justeringer af dansk lovgivning for at bringe denne i overensstemmelse med EU-retten.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEU Law and Policy AnalysisFrench-language works237,207