MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412337311

Rellich’s theorem, limiting absorption principle and radiation condition on manifold with ends

2015· article· en· W4412337311 on OpenAlexaff
Erik Skibsted, Kenichi Ito

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsLimitingManifold (fluid mechanics)RadiationAbsorption (acoustics)MathematicsPhysicsPure mathematicsOpticsEngineeringMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rellich's theorem, limiting absorption principle and radiation condition on manifold with ends Kenichi ITO $*$ and Erik SKIBSTED\dagger 1 Setting and results In this article we present without proofs a part of our results in an ongoing joint project [IS2].In particular, Rellich's theorem, the limiting absorption principle and the radiation condition are discussed for the Schr\"odinger operator $H=H_{0}+V$ ; $H_{0}=-\frac{1}{2}\triangle=\frac{1}{2}p_{i}^{*}g^{ij}p_{j},$ $p_{i}=-i\partial_{i},$ on a connected Riemannian manifold $(M_{9)}$ with asymptotically Euclidean and/or hyperbolic ends.Here $\triangle$ is the Laplace-Beltrami operator, and $V$ is a potential-type perturbation.In this section we introduce a set of assumptions on the geometry of $(M, g)$ and on the perturbation $V$ , and we state some of our main results.Our conditions are formulated abstractly in terms of a certain "escape function"' They apply to a wide class of manifolds and potentials.See Section 2 for concrete examples satisfying the conditions.Condition 1.1.Let $(M, g)$ be a connected Riemannian manifold of dimension $d\geq 1.$There exist a function $r\in C^{\infty}(M)$ with image $r(M)=[1, \infty$ ) and constants $c>0$ and $r_{0}\geq 2$ such that:1.The gradient vector field $\nabla r\in X(M)$ is forward complete, i.e., the integral curve of $\nabla r$ exists for any initial point $x\in M$ and any non-negative time $t\geq 0.$ The bound $|\nabla r|\geq c$ holds on $\{x\in M;r(x)>r_{0}/2\}.$We call each component of the open subset $E=\{x\in M;r(x)>r_{0}\}$ an end of $M.$The function $r$ may model a distance function there.In fact, only with Condition 1.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207