MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412345684 · doi:10.1121/10.0037183

Characterization of micro-scale gas leaks using an optomechanical ultrasound sensor

2025· article· en· W4412345684 on OpenAlexafffund
K. G. Scheuer, A Chen, Ghenesis Teves, R. G. DeCorby

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsThe Metabolomics Innovation CentreUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEmissions Reduction AlbertaGovernment of Alberta
KeywordsAcousticsMicrophoneBroadbandUltrasoundAcoustic sensorUltrasonic sensorEnergy (signal processing)PhysicsGas leakMaterials scienceOpticsSound pressureChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used an optomechanical microphone to measure the acoustic signals emitted by compressed-air jets emanating from apertures as small as ∼5 μm. In keeping with the predictions of aeroacoustic theory, spectra extending into the high-frequency (MHz) ultrasound region were observed. Most of this acoustic energy lies well above the range of a conventional ultrasonic microphone. Conversely, the broadband response of the optomechanical sensor offers the potential to localize and quantify leaks based on a more complete knowledge of the acoustic spectrum. We show that the minimum detectable flow rate, set by the onset of turbulence, scales with the hole size and was as low as ∼10-3 Pa·m3·s-1 for the smallest holes studied here. The results demonstrate that a sufficiently broadband and sensitive microphone might enhance the utility of "acoustic sniffer" tools for quantitative gas leak detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207