Incremental diagnostic value of AI-derived coronary artery calcium in <sup>18</sup> F-flurpiridaz PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Positron Emission Tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a powerful tool for predicting coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) provides incremental risk stratification to PET-MPI and enhances diagnostic accuracy. We assessed additive value of CAC score, derived from PET/CT attenuation maps to stress TPD results using the novel 18F-flurpiridaz tracer in detecting significant CAD. Methods and Results Patients from 18 F-flurpiridaz phase III clinical trial who underwent PET/CT MPI with 18 F-flurpiridaz tracer, had available CT attenuation correction (CTAC) scans for CAC scoring, and underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within a 6-month period between 2011 and 2013, were included. Total perfusion deficit (TPD) was quantified automatically, and CAC scores from CTAC scans were assessed using artificial intelligence (AI)-derived segmentation and manual scoring. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis in Left Main (LM) artery, or 70% or more stenosis in any of the other major epicardial vessels. Prediction performance for CAD was assessed by comparing the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for stress TPD alone and in combination with CAC score. Among 498 patients (72% males, median age 63 years) 30.1% had CAD. Incorporating CAC score resulted in a greater AUC: manual scoring (AUC=0.87, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.34-0.90; p=0.015) and AI-based scoring (AUC=0.88, 95%CI 0.85-0.90; p=0.002) compared to stress TPD alone (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.92). Conclusions Combining automatically derived TPD and CAC score enhances 18 F-flurpiridaz PET MPI accuracy in detecting significant CAD, offering a method that can be routinely used with PET/CT scanners without additional scanning or technologist time. CONDENSED ABSTRACT Background We assessed the added value of CAC score from hybrid PET/CT CTAC scans combined with stress TPD for detecting significant CAD using novel 18 F-flurpiridaz tracer Methods and results Patients from the 18 F-flurpiridaz phase III clinical trial (n=498, 72% male, median age 63) who underwent PET/CT MPI and ICA within 6-months were included. TPD was quantified automatically, and CAC scores were assessed by AI and manual methods. Adding CAC score to TPD improved AUC for manual (0.87) and AI-based (0.88) scoring versus TPD alone (0.84). Conclusions Combining TPD and CAC score enhances 18 F-flurpiridaz PET MPI accuracy for CAD detection Abstract Figure Graphical Abstract. Overview of the study design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".