Optimalisasi Metode Pembelajaran Interaktif dalam Kursus Komputer di LKP Karya Prima Secara Hybrid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Permasalahan utama dalam pelaksanaan kursus keterampilan di Lembaga Karya Prima adalah metode pembelajaran yang masih bersifat satu arah, sehingga partisipasi peserta kurang optimal. Tujuan pengabdian ini adalah untuk mengoptimalkan metode pembelajaran interaktif dalam meningkatkan efektivitas kursus keterampilan. Metode pelaksanaan meliputi sosialisasi, workshop, dan praktikum interaktif yang melibatkan 25 peserta dari berbagai latar belakang usia produktif. Evaluasi dilakukan melalui observasi langsung, pre-test dan post-test, serta refleksi harian peserta. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan keterampilan praktis peserta sebesar 75% dan peningkatan soft skill seperti komunikasi dan kerja tim sebesar 60%. Sebagian peserta juga mampu memanfaatkan keterampilan yang diperoleh untuk membuka usaha kecil secara mandiri. Kegiatan ini membuktikan bahwa metode pembelajaran interaktif mampu meningkatkan efektivitas proses kursus serta memberi dampak nyata terhadap kemandirian ekonomi peserta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".