MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412357334 · doi:10.63471/amlid25001

Big Data Analytics and Its Usage on Financial Fraud Detection in the USA

2025· article· en· W4412357334 on OpenAlexaff
Mubasher Jamil, Arif Hossen, Yeasin Arafat, Hasan Mahmud Sozib

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Machine Learning IoT and Data Security · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataAnalyticsBusinessData scienceFinancial fraudFinanceComputer scienceAccountingData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Big data analytics has emerged as a transformative tool in the financial services industry, particularly in the United States, where institutions manage trillions of dollars in daily transactions. This study explores how financial institutions leverage big data analytics for risk management, with a specific focus on fraud detection and prevention. By integrating advanced technologies such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, big data analytics enables the real-time processing of vast datasets to uncover hidden patterns, identify anomalies, and predict potential threats. Traditional fraud detection methods often fail to address the growing complexity and sophistication of financial crimes. In contrast, machine learning models like Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, and Random Forests provide robust solutions by offering enhanced predictive accuracy and adaptability to evolving fraud tactics. This study examines a dataset comprising demographic, transactional, and geographical features, which are analyzed using machine learning algorithms. In order to guarantee fair and reliable fraud detection systems, the report emphasizes the need to strike a balance between regulatory compliance and technical improvements. The results highlight how crucial it is to include big data analytics into financial risk management plans in order to improve operational security and client confidence. To further increase the effectiveness of fraud detection, future research should concentrate on improving machine learning models, correcting biases, and investigating cutting-edge technologies like blockchain. This study confirms that big data analytics is an essential part of the continuous development of financial security and risk mitigation in the digital age, in addition to being a potent instrument for preventing fraud. Case studies from leading U.S. financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase and PayPal, illustrate the real-world applications of big data in combating fraud. By integrating diverse data sources and leveraging advanced analytic techniques, these organizations have achieved notable reductions in fraudulent activities. The study concludes that big data analytics is not only a cornerstone of innovation and efficiency but also an essential component of modern risk management strategies. Future research should focus on addressing implementation challenges and exploring emerging technologies like blockchain to further enhance fraud detection capabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Machine Learning IoT and Data SecuritySame topicImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207