MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412363919 · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2025.102204

Diverse actions of 15 structurally unrelated mitochondrial uncouplers in cells and mice

2025· article· en· W4412363919 on OpenAlexaff
Divya P. Shah, Calum S Vancuylenburg, Ellen M. Olzomer, Sing-Young Chen, R. Justin Grams, Martina Beretta, Frances L. Byrne, Kyle L. Hoehn

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of New South Wales
KeywordsMitochondrionChemistryCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Mitochondrial uncouplers are used as chemical tools to study mitochondrial function in vitro and in vivo, and some molecules are in development for the treatment of metabolic diseases. One problem in the field is that any molecule that increases proton transport into the mitochondrial matrix independent of ATP production can be classified as an uncoupler regardless of off-target activities. Therefore, there are dozens of classes of molecules that exhibit a wide spectrum of phenotypes. Herein we directly compared 15 mitochondrial uncouplers side-by-side in a well-defined cell system to better understand their in vitro dose response profiles and the top molecules with suitable pharmacology and safety profiles were compared in db/db mice. METHODS: Fifteen mitochondrial uncouplers were characterised in vitro in CHO-K1 cells. The top five candidates were selected for further characterisation in male db/db mice based on their in vitro dose response and/or tolerability. We tested two doses of each mitochondrial uncoupler in mice and benchmarked their efficacy to a lifestyle intervention of 35% calorie restriction as well as to lean db/+ metabolically healthy mice. Eleven groups of mice were fed ad libitum either; 1) chow (control), 2) chow with 0.15% BAM15 (w/w), 3) chow with 0.2% BAM15 (w/w), 4) chow with 0.1% NEN (w/w), 5) chow with 0.25% NEN (w/w), 6) chow with 0.01% OPC-163493 (w/w), 7) chow with 0.02% OPC-63493 (w/w), 8) chow with 0.015% ES9 (w/w), 9) chow with 0.03% ES9 (w/w), 10) chow with 0.2% NTZ (w/w), and 11) chow with 0.4% NTZ (w/w). Another group of mice was fed chow to receive ∼65% of the average daily food intake of control mice as a model of calorie restriction (CR). Mice were metabolically phenotyped over 4 weeks of treatment with assessment of key readouts including body weight, HbA1c, blood glucose and glucose tolerance tests. At termination, key tissues were collected and plasma was analysed for markers of toxicity. RESULTS: Few mitochondrial uncouplers behaved similarly in vitro, with 11 molecules impairing maximal mitochondrial capacity. In vivo, BAM15 dose-dependently improved body weight and metabolic parameters in db/db mice, with 0.2% BAM15 treatment yielding statistically significant improvements in body weight, fat pad weight, glucose tolerance, blood glucose, HbA1c, liver weight and triglyceride content. The next-best treatment was 0.03% ES9 which significantly improved glucose tolerance, blood glucose levels, and HbA1c, but increased body weight, liver size and steatosis relative to db/db controls. CONCLUSIONS: Mitochondrial uncouplers BAM15 and ES9 had the greatest dose tolerance range in vitro, while BAM15 had the best overall effects on body weight, glucose control and liver steatosis in db/db mice. This study reveals diverse phenotypes across 15 classes of mitochondrial uncouplers and underscores the need for rigorous evaluation to identify molecules that drive stable mitochondrial respiration without unwanted mitochondrial inhibition or off-target effects. Ultimately, mitochondrial uncouplers should not be generalized and each uncoupler molecule needs to be considered by its own actions in well-defined experimental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MetabolismSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207