Diverse actions of 15 structurally unrelated mitochondrial uncouplers in cells and mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mitochondrial uncouplers are used as chemical tools to study mitochondrial function in vitro and in vivo, and some molecules are in development for the treatment of metabolic diseases. One problem in the field is that any molecule that increases proton transport into the mitochondrial matrix independent of ATP production can be classified as an uncoupler regardless of off-target activities. Therefore, there are dozens of classes of molecules that exhibit a wide spectrum of phenotypes. Herein we directly compared 15 mitochondrial uncouplers side-by-side in a well-defined cell system to better understand their in vitro dose response profiles and the top molecules with suitable pharmacology and safety profiles were compared in db/db mice. METHODS: Fifteen mitochondrial uncouplers were characterised in vitro in CHO-K1 cells. The top five candidates were selected for further characterisation in male db/db mice based on their in vitro dose response and/or tolerability. We tested two doses of each mitochondrial uncoupler in mice and benchmarked their efficacy to a lifestyle intervention of 35% calorie restriction as well as to lean db/+ metabolically healthy mice. Eleven groups of mice were fed ad libitum either; 1) chow (control), 2) chow with 0.15% BAM15 (w/w), 3) chow with 0.2% BAM15 (w/w), 4) chow with 0.1% NEN (w/w), 5) chow with 0.25% NEN (w/w), 6) chow with 0.01% OPC-163493 (w/w), 7) chow with 0.02% OPC-63493 (w/w), 8) chow with 0.015% ES9 (w/w), 9) chow with 0.03% ES9 (w/w), 10) chow with 0.2% NTZ (w/w), and 11) chow with 0.4% NTZ (w/w). Another group of mice was fed chow to receive ∼65% of the average daily food intake of control mice as a model of calorie restriction (CR). Mice were metabolically phenotyped over 4 weeks of treatment with assessment of key readouts including body weight, HbA1c, blood glucose and glucose tolerance tests. At termination, key tissues were collected and plasma was analysed for markers of toxicity. RESULTS: Few mitochondrial uncouplers behaved similarly in vitro, with 11 molecules impairing maximal mitochondrial capacity. In vivo, BAM15 dose-dependently improved body weight and metabolic parameters in db/db mice, with 0.2% BAM15 treatment yielding statistically significant improvements in body weight, fat pad weight, glucose tolerance, blood glucose, HbA1c, liver weight and triglyceride content. The next-best treatment was 0.03% ES9 which significantly improved glucose tolerance, blood glucose levels, and HbA1c, but increased body weight, liver size and steatosis relative to db/db controls. CONCLUSIONS: Mitochondrial uncouplers BAM15 and ES9 had the greatest dose tolerance range in vitro, while BAM15 had the best overall effects on body weight, glucose control and liver steatosis in db/db mice. This study reveals diverse phenotypes across 15 classes of mitochondrial uncouplers and underscores the need for rigorous evaluation to identify molecules that drive stable mitochondrial respiration without unwanted mitochondrial inhibition or off-target effects. Ultimately, mitochondrial uncouplers should not be generalized and each uncoupler molecule needs to be considered by its own actions in well-defined experimental conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".