MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412364369 · doi:10.4000/14c7x

A Flag of Inconvenience? Reaction to Irish Independence in the British Empire in 1922

2025· book-chapter· en· W4412364369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mícheál Ó Fathartaigh, Liam Weeks

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Caen eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlag (linear algebra)Independence (probability theory)IrishEmpireHistoryAncient historyPolitical scienceArtPhilosophyLinguisticsMathematicsAlgebra over a fieldStatisticsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Anglo-Irish Treaty gave most of Ireland substantive political independence; not full sovereignty as a republic, rather partial sovereignty, as a dominion: the Irish Free State, which became part of the British Empire. Thus, in 1922 Ireland took its place among the dominions. Each greeted it differently. Australia and New Zealand were wary before becoming quite hostile; Canada and South Africa were consistently positive; and Newfoundland was positive and then a little concerned. These reactions to Irish independence reflected four things: attitudes towards Irish nationalism; feelings towards Irish immigrant communities; each country’s sense of national identity; and the direction in which each country wanted to develop its sovereignty. Another reaction to Irish independence came from Indian nationalists who were seeking dominion status and derived huge encouragement from Ireland. Newly independent Ireland’s diplomatic stance also set the tone for how its foreign policy would evolve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Caen eBooksSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207