Incorporation of Horizontal Aquifer Flow into a Vertical Vadose Zone Model to Simulate Natural Groundwater Table Fluctuations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main goal of our work was to evaluate approaches for modeling lateral outflow from shallow unconfined aquifers in a one-dimensional model of vertical variably-saturated flow. The HYDRUS-1D model was modified by implementing formulas representing lateral flow in an aquifer, with linear or quadratic drainage functions describing the relationship between groundwater head and flux. The results obtained by the modified HYDRUS-1D model were compared to the reference simulations with HydroGeoSphere (HGS), with explicit representation of 2D flow in unsaturated and saturated zones in a vertical cross-section of a strip aquifer, including evapotranspiration and plant water uptake. Four series of simulations were conducted for sand and loamy sand soil profiles with deep (6 m) and shallow (2 m) water tables. The results indicate that both linear and quadratic drainage functions can effectively capture groundwater table fluctuations and soil water dynamics. HYDRUS-1D demonstrates notable accuracy in simulating transient fluctuations but shows higher variability near the surface. The study concludes that both quadratic and linear drainage boundary conditions can effectively represent horizontal aquifer flow in 1D models, enhancing the ability of such models to simulate groundwater table fluctuations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".