MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412368845 · doi:10.1177/03611981251340386

Illinois Tollway Specification Management and Resource Tool

2025· article· en· W4412368845 on OpenAlexaff
José Rivera-Perez, J. L. Richard, Raj Rajasekhar, Rick Young, Laura Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProcess (computing)BiddingQuality (philosophy)Resource (disambiguation)Bridge (graph theory)Software engineeringChange controlScheduleRisk analysis (engineering)Engineering managementControl (management)EngineeringBusinessProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transportation agencies require special provisions to issue the requirements for various elements of highway and bridge construction, which must frequently adapt to changes in field conditions, innovations, and techniques conducted through research. A major challenge for designers is that these special provisions must be included in the specification book assembled as part of the contract documents. It is a common occurrence that specification books often omit special provisions, related special provisions, or required pay items, owing to human error or unfamiliarity with the requirements. These errors can lead to unbalanced bidding or cause change orders during construction. As a result, this paper is focused on the development and implementation of a tool to assist designers in streamlining the process of selecting special provisions and assembling a specification book for contracts bid by the Illinois Tollway using a web-based tool. The tool, named the Specification Management and Resource Tool (SMART), allows designers to input the itemized list of pay items and obtain a complete list of required special provisions needed to assemble the specification book. SMART also has search capabilities that enable designers to quickly identify special provisions, access the document, and compile a complete list of special provisions and associated pay items derived from the specification requirements. This allows designers to improve their quality control processes and reduce the likelihood of errors that cause cost increases or overruns to the agency. The tool is available at: https://smart.wspis.com/ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1660.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207