Behavioral, Endocrine, and Neuronal Responses to Odors in Lampreys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
) is among the best characterized in vertebrates. In recent decades, tremendous advances have been made by isolating individual compounds from sea lampreys that can replicate natural behavior when artificially applied in the wild. In no other aquatic vertebrate has the olfactory ecology been described in such extensive detail. In the first section, we provide a comprehensive review of olfactory behaviors induced by specific, individual odorants during every major developmental stage of the sea lamprey in behavioral contexts such as feeding, predator avoidance, and reproduction. Moreover, pheromonal inputs have been shown to induce neuroendocrine responses through the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, triggering remarkable developmental and physiological effects, such as gametogenesis and increased pheromone release. In the second section of this review, we describe a hypothetical endocrine signaling pathway through which reproductive fitness is increased following pheromone detection. In the final section of this review, we focus on the neuronal circuits that transform olfactory inputs into motor output. We describe specific brain signaling pathways that underlie odor-evoked locomotion. Furthermore, we consider possible modulatory inputs to these pathways that may induce plasticity in olfactory behavior following changes in the external or internal environment. As a whole, this review synthesizes previous and recent progress in understanding the behavioral, endocrine, and neuronal responses of lampreys to chemosensory signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".