MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412375744 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2025.3573736

Interturn Fault Diagnosis in Sensorless PMSM Drive Based on Negative-Sequence Reactive Power Distortions

2025· article· en· W4412375744 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shivateja Manala, Jeevanand Seshadrinath

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Science and Technology, Government of Kerala
KeywordsComputer scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stator interturn fault (ITF) is the most common failure in electrical machines; if no prompt detection is implemented, it can cause catastrophic results. This work proposes a novel method in permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) drives to detect the ITF, which is insular to speed and load variations. The proposed ITF technique is based on negative-sequence instantaneous reactive power (IRP) distortions. The sensorless control of the PMSM drive, while using field-oriented technique, uses the voltage and current information for rotor position estimation. This serves the dual purpose of controlling the drive and also in developing the diagnostic technique. The IRP distortion is calculated from dq-reference frame voltage distortions, which are estimated using Luenberger observer and dq-reference frame current distortions. The novel fault indicator is calculated based on the vector magnitude of dc components obtained from negative-sequence IRP distortions, which is insular to various speed and load conditions of the drive. The proposed ITF detection technique is experimentally validated under varying load and speed conditions of the sensorless field-oriented controlled (FOC) PMSM drive. Further, a comparison of the proposed ITF detection scheme with the dq-reference frame current residuals technique shows the superiority of the proposed ITF detection scheme under various speed and load conditions of the PMSM drive scheme; furthermore, the reliability of the proposed ITF detection technique under various noise conditions is also verified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207