MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412376451 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v10i1.62293

Chasing robbers on percolated random geometric graphs

2015· article· en· W4412376451 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Anshui Li, Tobias Müller, Paweł Prałat

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsRandom graphDiscrete mathematicsGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the vertex pursuit game of \emph{Cops and Robbers}, in which cops try to capture a robber on the vertices of a graph. The minimum number of cops required to win on a given graph $G$ is called the cop number of $G$. We focus on $\G(n,r,p)$, a percolated random geometric graph in which $n$ vertices are chosen uniformly at random and independently from $[0,1]^2$, and two vertices are adjacent with probability $p$ if the Euclidean distance between them is at most $r$. We present asymptotic results for the game of Cops and Robber played on $\G(n,r,p)$ for a wide range of $p=p(n)$ and $r=r(n)$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207