MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412379992 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.241320-f

Intégrer la prise en charge de la douleur chronique dans les soins aux personnes atteintes d’un trouble lié à l’utilisation d’opioïdes

2025· article· fr· W4412379992 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kiran Grant, Michael Butterfield, Paxton Bach

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Voir la version anglaise de l’article ici : www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.241320][1] Points clés Malgré des investissements substantiels dans la réduction des méfaits et le traitement des toxicomanies, la crise des surdoses persiste au Canada. En dépit de l’intérêt considérable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment→French-language works237,207→