MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412384011 · doi:10.1038/s41531-025-01066-0

Fasting and postprandial Ghrelin levels in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4412384011 on OpenAlexafffund
Henrique José Cavalcanti Bezerra Gouveia, Osmar Henrique Dos Santos-Júnior, Johannes Frasnelli

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Parkinson s Disease · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de PernambucoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsGhrelinPostprandialInternal medicineEndocrinologyParkinson's diseaseMedicineMeta-analysisHormoneDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive movement disorder with motor and non-motor symptoms, including gastrointestinal and olfactory dysfunctions. These symptoms may be associated with plasma concentrations of the hormone ghrelin. Lower fasting and postprandial plasma levels of total and active ghrelin were reported in PD, despite heterogeneous findings. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the magnitude of ghrelin dysregulation in PD and explored associated factors. We included quasi-experimental and observational studies assessing fasting and postprandial plasma concentrations of total and/or active ghrelin in individuals with PD and controls (eight studies; 985 subjects). Compared to controls, fasting individuals with PD exhibited a significant reduction in total and active ghrelin concentrations. PD also showed significantly reduced postprandial concentrations of total and active ghrelin. This meta-analysis suggests that ghrelin may be crucially involved in the dysfunctions often observed in PD. Further studies should explore factors such as sex, drug therapy, and disease stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.015
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Parkinson s DiseaseSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207