MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Resocialisation of offenders: international experience

2025· article· en· W4412386940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. V. Tkachenko

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical and Comparative Jurisprudence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicImpulse Buying and Technology Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminologyPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines the role of resocialization as a key tool of modern criminological policy aimed at reducing recidivism and ensuring public safety of the state. Punishment, in addition to its punitive function, should protect society by reintegrating offenders through socio-legal, economic and psychological mechanisms. However, social stigmatization and the lack of effectiveness of programs complicate this process, increasing the risk of recidivism. The purpose of the study is to analyze international legislation on the application of resocialization to offenders and its implementation in Ukrainian legislation. The author emphasizes the need for cooperation between government agencies, civil society, business and the media in creating conditions for the effective reintegration of persons released from prison. The study summarizes international experience of resocialization in such countries as: Germany, Lithuania, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Canada, etc. Successful practices of implementing social adaptation infrastructure, including reintegration centers, training programs, employment support, overcoming addictions and developing life skills are considered. The author draws attention to the peculiarities of applying the stages of resocialization during the serving of sentence and after release. The author analyzes the legal framework for resocialization in Ukraine, in particular, the role of the Criminal Executive Code, the Law “On Probation” and legislation in the field of employment. The author states that despite the existing guarantees, the practical implementation of resocialization programs in Ukraine faces a number of difficulties, including limited funding and the lack of effective special programs. However, in order to develop resocialization programs adapted to today’s realities, as well as to increase the role of probation authorities and social adaptation centers in accompanying offenders (released from prison), there is a need to implement international experience (international practices).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical and Comparative JurisprudenceSame topicImpulse Buying and Technology ImpactsFrench-language works237,207