MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412389613 · doi:10.3390/ma18143294

Methodology for the Early Detection of Damage Using CEEMDAN-Hilbert Spectral Analysis of Ultrasonic Wave Attenuation

2025· article· en· W4412389613 on OpenAlexafffund
Ammar M. Shakir, Giovanni Cascante, Taher H. Ameen

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformAttenuationAcousticsTime domainSIGNAL (programming language)Noise (video)Frequency domainNonlinear systemEnergy (signal processing)Signal processingSpurious relationshipHilbert transformSensitivity (control systems)Ultrasonic sensorSpectral densityComputer scienceMathematicsOpticsPhysicsElectronic engineeringEngineeringStatisticsDigital signal processingArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, such as those based on wave velocity measurements, lack the sensitivity necessary to detect early-stage damage in concrete structures. Similarly, common signal processing techniques often assume linearity and stationarity among the signal data. By analyzing wave attenuation measurements using advanced signal processing techniques, mainly Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT), this work aims to enhance the early detection of damage in concrete. This study presents a novel energy-based technique that integrates complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) and Hilbert spectrum analysis (HSA), to accurately capture nonlinear and nonstationary signal behaviors. Ultrasonic non-destructive testing was performed in this study on manufactured concrete specimens subjected to micro-damage characterized by internal microcracks smaller than 0.5 mm, induced through controlled freeze-thaw cycles. The recorded signals were decomposed from the time domain using CEEMDAN into frequency-ordered intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). A multi-criteria selection strategy, including damage index evaluation, was employed to identify the most effective IMFs while distinguishing true damage-induced energy loss from spurious nonlinear artifacts or noise. Localized damage was then analyzed in the frequency domain using HSA, achieving an up to 88% reduction in wave energy via Marginal Hilbert Spectrum analysis, compared to 68% using Fourier-based techniques, demonstrating a 20% improvement in sensitivity. The results indicate that the proposed technique enhances early damage detection through wave attenuation analysis and offers a superior ability to handle nonlinear, nonstationary signals. The Hilbert Spectrum provided a higher time-frequency resolution, enabling clearer identification of damage-related features. These findings highlight the potential of CEEMDAN-HSA as a practical, sensitive tool for early-stage microcrack detection in concrete.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterialsSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207