MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412391665 · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103035

Replacing Iron and Preventing Anemia in Pregnant patients of Limited Economic means (RIPPLE): The Impact of Funding Iron Supplementation in Pregnancy

2025· article· en· W4412391665 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Suman Memon, Jeannie Callum, Chantal Armali, Elaine Herer, A. Malkin, Anne McLeod, Harley Meirovich, Michelle Sholzberg, Yulia Lin, Heather VanderMeulen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Blood ServicesSunnybrook FoundationOctapharmaPfizer
KeywordsMedicineAnemiaFerritinPregnancyHemoglobinCohortIron deficiencyPediatricsObstetricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Can funding iron supplementation for low-income pregnant patients reduce socioeconomic disparities in anemia rates at delivery? METHODS: This single-centre cohort study reviewed hematologic parameters and iron supplementation patterns in 3 groups: patients from low-income neighbourhoods, non-low-income neighbourhoods, and low-income patients enrolled in the RIPPLE (Replacing Iron and Preventing anemia in Pregnant patients of Limited Economic means) program. RIPPLE provided access to intravenous iron to patients with an annual household income ≤$50 000 CAD and moderate-to-severe iron deficiency anemia, symptomatic iron deficiency with intolerance/inadequate response to oral iron, or iron deficiency anemia with less than 4 weeks to delivery. Patients were referred by their obstetrical provider, hematologist, or pharmacist. The primary outcome was anemia (hemoglobin <110 g/L) at delivery. RESULTS: Among 1206 patients (577 low-income, 603 non-low-income, 26 RIPPLE), anemia at delivery was more frequent in RIPPLE (54%) versus low-income (10%) and non-low-income (7%) groups (P < 0.0001). RIPPLE participants exhibited lower nadir hemoglobin (98.8 ± 9.9 g/L) and ferritin (9.6 ± 6.4 μg/L) compared to low-income (hemoglobin 114.2 ± 10.1 g/L, P < 0.0001; ferritin 30.0 ± 24.0 μg/L, P < 0.0001) and non-low-income groups (hemoglobin 115.9 ± 8.1 g/L, P < 0.0001; ferritin 40.9 ± 44.1 μg/L, P < 0.0001), and received infusions later in pregnancy (≤3 weeks pre-delivery: 42% vs. 27% vs. 9%). The RIPPLE cohort included more racial and ethnic minoritized individuals (73% vs. 58% vs. 33%). CONCLUSIONS: While funding for iron supplementation addressed cost barriers, disparities in care persisted. Our findings underscore the need for universal access to early screening and timely escalation from oral to intravenous iron to reduce social, racial, and ethnic disparities in care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada→Same topicIron Metabolism and Disorders→French-language works237,207→