MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412395962 · doi:10.1590/2317-6172202526

Pensando o Direito e Desenvolvimento com Mariana Mota Prado: a riqueza dos acasos, dos diálogos reflexivos e das traduções que transcendem barreiras

2025· article· pt· W4412395962 on OpenAlexaff
Mariana Mota Prado, André Peron Pereira Curiati, Betina Le Grazie, Pedro Duarte Pinho, Isabella Caroline Cristino, Jéssica Loyola Caetano Rios, Marcella PUPPIO, Michelle Ratton Sanchez Badin, Odara Gonzaga de Andrade, Natália Santana dos Santos, Quéren Samai Moraes Santana

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Direito GV · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJudicial and Constitutional Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogos Bible SoftwareHumanitiesPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

identificadas como bibliografia obrigatória do campo do Direito e Desenvolvimento com experiência internacional.Mariana Prado, interessantemente, posiciona o Brasil e suas questões como objeto central de seu estudo, com trocas acadêmicas bastante proveitosas para aqueles que se interessam pelo campo no Brasil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.045
Scholarly communication0.0160.015
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0130.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevista Direito GVSame topicJudicial and Constitutional StudiesFrench-language works237,207