MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412397007 · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbaf170

Hybrid representation learning for human m6A modifications with chromosome-level generalizability

2024· article· en· W4412397007 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeneralizability theoryChromosomeRepresentation (politics)Computational biologyPsychologyComputer scienceBiologyArtificial intelligenceGeneticsDevelopmental psychologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Motivation N 6 - methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant internal modification in eukaryotic mRNA and plays essential roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation. While several deep learning approaches have been proposed to predict m6A sites, most suffer from limited chromosome-level generalizability due to evaluation on randomly split datasets. Results In this study, we propose two novel hybrid deep learning models—Hybrid Model and Hybrid Deep Model—that integrate local sequence features (k-mers) and contextual embeddings via convolutional neural networks to improve predictive performance and generalization. We evaluate these models using both a Random-Split strategy and a more biologically realistic Leave-One-Chromosome-Out setting to ensure robustness across genomic regions. Our proposed models outperform the state-of-the-art m6A-TCPred model across all key evaluation metrics. Hybrid Deep Model achieves the highest accuracy under Random-Split, while Hybrid Model demonstrates superior generalization under Leave-One-Chromosome-Out, indicating that deep global representations may overfit in chromosome-independent settings. These findings underscore the importance of rigorous validation strategies and offer insights into designing robust m6A predictors. Availability and implementation Source code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/malikmtahir/LOCO-m6A

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it