Hybrid representation learning for human m6A modifications with chromosome-level generalizability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Motivation N 6 - methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant internal modification in eukaryotic mRNA and plays essential roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation. While several deep learning approaches have been proposed to predict m6A sites, most suffer from limited chromosome-level generalizability due to evaluation on randomly split datasets. Results In this study, we propose two novel hybrid deep learning models—Hybrid Model and Hybrid Deep Model—that integrate local sequence features (k-mers) and contextual embeddings via convolutional neural networks to improve predictive performance and generalization. We evaluate these models using both a Random-Split strategy and a more biologically realistic Leave-One-Chromosome-Out setting to ensure robustness across genomic regions. Our proposed models outperform the state-of-the-art m6A-TCPred model across all key evaluation metrics. Hybrid Deep Model achieves the highest accuracy under Random-Split, while Hybrid Model demonstrates superior generalization under Leave-One-Chromosome-Out, indicating that deep global representations may overfit in chromosome-independent settings. These findings underscore the importance of rigorous validation strategies and offer insights into designing robust m6A predictors. Availability and implementation Source code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/malikmtahir/LOCO-m6A
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".