MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412401282 · doi:10.1245/s10434-025-17787-8

Natural History of Primary Retroperitoneal Extra-Visceral Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors (PEC): A Study from Transatlantic and Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG)

2025· article· en· W4412401282 on OpenAlexaff
Eyal Mor, Sameer Apte, Catherine Mitchell, Carolyn Nessim, Max Almond, Bruno Vincenzi, José Antonio González López, Lee D. Cranmer, Michael J. Wagner, Aviram Nissan, Miguel Henriques Abreu, Markus Albertsmeier, Adam D. Barlow, Emily Z. Keung, Giovanni Grignani, Jason L. Hornick, Alessandro Gronchi, David Gyorki

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Surgical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Melbourne
KeywordsMedicineSurgical oncologyClear-cell sarcomaAngiomyolipomaSarcomaNatural historyRadiologyPathologyInternal medicineKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) are a rare family of mesenchymal tumors that include several subtypes. There are very limited data describing the natural history of patients with extra-visceral retroperitoneal PEComas of the retroperitoneum. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical features, treatment patterns, outcomes, and diagnostic challenges of primary extra-visceral retroperitoneal or abdominopelvic PEComa over the past decade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all extra-visceral, non-renal, retroperitoneal, or abdominopelvic PEComas treated at participating centers over the past 10 years. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients from 13 centers were included. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range 18-81 years); 73% were female. The median size was 9 cm. The tumor was classified as a PEComa not otherwise specified (NOS) in 55 (71%), sclerosing PEComa in 11 (15%), and angiomyolipoma (AML) in 11 (15%). Treatment intent was curative in 59 (77%) patients. Adjuvant radiation was given in five (8%) patients, and (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy was given to six (10%). Of those who did not undergo curative intent treatment, four (22%) patients had metastatic disease and three (17%) had primary unresectable disease. With a median follow-up of 26 months (2.3-147 months), 24 (40%) of the 59 patients having curative treatment had recurred. Recurrence rates differed by subtype, with 20 (37%) of the PEComa NOS group, 3 (27%) of the sclerosing PEComa group, and 1 (9%) of the AML group developing recurrence. The estimated 5-year OS of the whole cohort was 63% and 75% for the curative intent group. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal and abdominopelvic PEComas show distinct behaviors by subtype. PEComa NOS had the highest recurrence and mortality, sclerosing PEComa showed intermediate risk, and AML was indolent. Histological classification is essential for prognosis and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Surgical OncologySame topicTuberous Sclerosis Complex ResearchFrench-language works237,207