Corrosion type identification in flanged joints using recurrent neural networks on electrochemical noise measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bolted flanged joints are essential for connecting piping and process equipment but are vulnerable to localized corrosion that leads to sudden, unpredictable leaks. Electrochemical noise (EN) measurements can detect such corrosion, yet processing EN data is time-consuming and requires expertise. This study applies recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to automate corrosion type identification on flange surfaces using raw EN signals from spontaneous electrochemical reactions. In this work, supervised, hybrid, and unsupervised ML approaches are evaluated using experimentally obtained EN data. Among supervised models, the long short-term memory (LSTM) model achieves 93.62% accuracy. A hybrid method combining LSTM autoencoder features with a random forest classifier improves accuracy to 97.85%. An unsupervised method using LSTM autoencoder, principal component analysis, and k-means clustering also shows strong potential for real-time corrosion monitoring. Automated identification of corrosion types on flanged joints supports more effective material protection strategies, reducing the risk of failure in critical infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".