MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412404194 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3588813

Multisource Time-Lapse Elastic Full-Waveform Inversion Using a Target-Oriented Common-Model Strategy

2025· article· en· W4412404194 on OpenAlexafffund
Xin Fu, Daniel Trad, K. A. Innanen, Danping Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInversion (geology)WaveformSource modelComputer scienceGeologyRemote sensingRadarSeismologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a powerful tool for time-lapse seismic analysis, enabling high-resolution imaging of subsurface physical properties to monitor reservoir changes during injection, production, and long-term CO2 storage. However, conventional time-lapse FWI, which relies on a parallel inversion strategy, suffers from significant artifacts due to survey non-repeatability, disrupting convergence consistency between baseline and monitor inversions. Additionally, the high computational cost remains a major challenge. To address these limitations, we propose a novel time-lapse FWI strategy—the target-oriented (TO) common-model strategy (CMS)—which strategically integrates multiple approaches. Our method combines TO FWI, which enhances model convergence in the target region to improve time-lapse accuracy, with CMS, which reduces artifacts by using an optimized starting model to guide baseline and monitor inversions toward similar convergence paths. Additionally, we employ an amplitude-encoding multi-source strategy, significantly reducing computational costs without compromising inversion accuracy. Through extensive elastic tests, we validate the robustness and effectiveness of TO CMS, demonstrating superior performance over both the conventional parallel strategy and standard CMS across various challenging scenarios—including non-repeated source positions, random noise, seawater velocity variations, and biased initial models. Notably, strong noise and seawater velocity variations can significantly impact time-lapse FWI results, highlighting the need for further investigation. Ensuring consistent multi-source parameters in time-lapse FWI can help minimize artifacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207