DASFormer: self-supervised pretraining for earthquake monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Earthquake monitoring is a fundamental task to unravel the underlying physics of earthquakes and mitigate associated hazards for public safety. Distributed acoustic sensing, or DAS, which transforms pre-existing telecommunication cables into ultra-dense seismic networks, offers a cost-effective and scalable solution for next-generation earthquake monitoring. However, current approaches for earthquake monitoring like PhaseNet and PhaseNet-2 primarily rely on supervised learning, while manually labeled DAS data is quite limited and it is difficult to obtain more annotated datasets. In this paper, we present DASFormer, a novel self-supervised pretraining technique on DAS data with a coarse-to-fine framework that models spatial-temporal signal correlation. We treat earthquake monitoring as an anomaly detection task and demonstrate DASFormer can be directly utilized as a seismic phase detector. Experimental results demonstrate that DASFormer is effective in terms of several evaluation metrics and outperforms state-of-the-art time-series forecasting, anomaly detection, and foundation models on the unsupervised seismic detection task. We also demonstrate the potential of fine-tuning DASFormer to downstream tasks through case studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".