COLA-GLM: collaborative one-shot and lossless algorithms of generalized linear models for decentralized observational healthcare data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical insights from real-world data often require aggregating information from institutions to ensure sufficient sample sizes and generalizability. However, patient privacy concerns only limit the sharing of patient-level data, and traditional federated learning algorithms, relying on extensive back-and-forth communications, can be inefficient to implement. We introduce the Collaborative One-shot Lossless Algorithm for Generalized Linear Models (COLA-GLM), a novel federated learning algorithm that supports diverse outcome types via generalized linear models and achieves results identical to a pooled patient-level data analysis (lossless) with only a single round of aggregated data exchange (one-shot). To further protect aggregated institutional data, we developed a secure extension, secure-COLA-GLM, utilizing homomorphic encryption. We demonstrated the effectiveness and lossless property of COLA-GLM through applications to an international influenza cohort and a decentralized U.S. COVID-19 mortality study. COLA-GLM and secure-COLA-GLM offer a scalable, efficient solution for decentralized collaborative learning involving multiple data partners and diverse security requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".