MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412416133 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.09.663963

Functional connectivity differences in adult’s ADHD – a MEG study

2025· preprint· en· W4412416133 on OpenAlexafffund
Pedram Mouseli, Benjamin T. Dunkley, Massieh Moayedi

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersFaculty of Dentistry, University of TorontoUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsFunctional connectivityPsychologyNeuroscienceCognitive psychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The neurobiology of adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), particularly functional brain network connectivity, remain poorly understood. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) can reveal frequency-specific network dynamics given its high temporal resolution. Here, we investigated intrinsic functional connectivity differences between adults with ADHD (n = 24) and healthy controls (n = 44) using MEG data from the Open MEG Archive (OMEGA) dataset. We employed source reconstruction (Destrieux atlas), weighted phase-lag index (wPLI) connectivity across six frequency bands, graph theory metrics (Characteristic Path Length (CPL), node strength, clustering coefficient), and network-based statistics (NBS). We observed widespread hypo-connectivity in the high-gamma band (50-150 Hz) in adults with ADHD compared to controls. NBS identified a significant high-gamma sub-network, predominantly involving dorsal and ventral attention networks (DAN/VAN) and default mode network (DMN) nodes centered around a left fusiform gyrus hub, where all constituent connections exhibited consistently lower connectivity in the ADHD group. Globally, this was reflected in reduced gamma network integration (longer CPL) within the DAN and VAN. Locally, reduced high-gamma clustering was observed in VAN nodes (e.g., insula) and reduced node strength in a DAN region (postcentral sulcus). Predictive modeling using ElasticNet regression confirmed the importance of high-gamma metrics, with CPL measures yielding moderate classification accuracy (AUC ≈ 0.70–0.73). In contrast to high-gamma findings, the alpha band showed increased integration (shorter CPL) within the DMN and between the VAN and DAN in the ADHD group, alongside differences in alpha and beta band node properties in cingulate and somatomotor regions. Our findings reveal robust, frequency-dependent functional network alterations in adult ADHD, particularly highlighting disrupted high-frequency communication within and between key cognitive networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder→French-language works237,207→