A Machine-Learning-Based Data Science Framework for Effectively and Efficiently Processing, Managing, and Visualizing Big Sequential Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the open data initiative has led to the willingness of many governments, researchers, and organizations to share their data and make it publicly available. Healthcare, disease, and epidemiological data, such as privacy statistics on patients who have suffered from epidemic diseases such as the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are examples of open big data. Therefore, huge volumes of valuable data have been generated and collected at high speed from a wide variety of rich data sources. Analyzing these open big data can be of social benefit. For example, people gain a better understanding of disease by analyzing and mining disease statistics, which can inspire them to participate in disease prevention, detection, control, and combat. Visual representation further improves data understanding and corresponding results for analysis and mining, as a picture is worth a thousand words. In this paper, we present a visual data science solution for the visualization and visual analysis of large sequence data. These ideas are illustrated by the visualization and visual analysis of sequences of real epidemiological data of COVID-19. Through our solution, we enable users to visualize the epidemiological data of COVID-19 over time. It also allows people to visually analyze data and discover relationships between popular features associated with COVID-19 cases. The effectiveness of our visual data science solution in improving the user experience of visualization and visual analysis of large sequence data is demonstrated by the real-life evaluation of these sequenced epidemiological data of COVID-19.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".