MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412421290 · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2025.152120

Exposure to a gradient of freshwater pulses duration mimicking frequent floodings reveals species-specific vulnerability thresholds in an assemblage of key benthic molluscs

2025· article· en· W4412421290 on OpenAlexafffund
Valentine Loiseau, Piero Calosi, David Drolet, Mathieu Cusson, Yanick Gendreau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à ChicoutimiUniversité du Québec à RimouskiFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFisheries and Oceans CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsBiologyBenthic zoneEcologyKey (lock)Vulnerability (computing)Assemblage (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estuarine communities provide many ecosystem services and are highly vulnerable to global changes. Detrimental changes in land use and intense rainfall events increase the frequency and intensity of flooding, causing abrupt changes in estuarine conditions. As a result, marine organisms are more often exposed to freshwater conditions for several days after flooding. While estuarine organisms are able to thrive under fluctuating salinities, their responses to intense and prolonged hypoosmotic stress may differ. Understanding these responses is crucial as salinity variability is key to species distribution. Changes in hydrological regimes are occurring much faster in high latitudes environments, yet subarctic estuarian communities are rarely studied. Our study investigates the sensitivity of three key marine benthic macroinvertebrates inhabiting subarctic estuaries ( Littorina saxatilis , Macoma balthica and Mytilus spp.) to different durations of freshwater exposure. In laboratory conditions, molluscs were exposed during six weeks to a gradient of 12 freshwater pulse durations, ranging from 0 to 9 d, interspersed with 24 h of exposure to sea water. Mortality and shell growth, as well as energy content for Mytilus spp., were compared after two, four and six weeks of exposure using linear mixed models and break-point analyses. All three species demonstrated tolerance to short-duration freshwater pulses (less than 2 d) repeated over several weeks. Littorina saxatilis exhibited the highest vulnerability, with mortality increasing under freshwater pulses longer than 2 d after two weeks. Macoma balthica displayed a comparable threshold but only after four weeks. Mytilus spp. displayed the greatest tolerance, with a threshold only detectable after six weeks of exposure and increasing mortality in treatments with freshwater pulses longer than 5 d. In addition, shell growth decreased with increasing duration of freshwater pulse only in L. saxatilis while it was not affected in M. balthica and Mytilus spp. Energy content in Mytilus spp. varied according to pulse duration and time, with the highest energy content being detected in the longer freshwater exposure periods, suggesting complex physiological responses to hypoosmotic stress. Altogether, our study indicates the existence of highly species-specific differences in freshwater vulnerability among marine benthic macroinvertebrates inhabiting subarctic estuaries. Our findings highlight the importance of using gradients of stress scenarios to identify ecologically relevant thresholds, helping in the prediction and management of extreme climate events like river floods on estuarine communities. Our study provides valuable recommendations for dam management and biodiversity conservation in estuarine ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and EcologySame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207