MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412428440 · doi:10.3138/flor-2022-1003

The Blackness of Medieval Dance

2025· article· en· W4412428440 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kathryn Dickason

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorilegium · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines medieval European dance from the perspective of race. Specifically, it interprets texts and images from the Late Middle Ages that integrate dance and blackness in provocative and revelatory ways. The analysis reveals that processes of premodern racialization were just as mobile and fluid as the dancing bodies were themselves. This study is indebted to medievalist Cord Whitaker’s recent scholarship on “black metaphors” and their role in the construction of medieval race-thinking. While Whitaker’s study is based on literature and rhetoric, I argue that medieval dance also participated in metaphorical configurations of race-making. In summary, this article contributes to a larger study on the global Middle Ages and gestures toward a decolonization of medieval studies and dance studies. Examining the oscillating significance of the blackness of medieval dance may inform the contemporary moment as it wrestles with the legacy of racism and biopolitics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlorilegiumSame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207