Effects of Medical Ozone Injection via Intervertebral Foramen Epidural Space on Postherpetic Neuralgia: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled and Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that ozone injection into the dorsal root ganglion significantly reduces pain scores associated with herpes zoster, suggesting its therapeutic potential for managing postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) via the intervertebral foramen epidural space. However, there are no specific reports addressing the treatment of herpes zoster and PHN by involving the thoracic and lumbar nerves under computed tomography (CT) guidance. Our research focuses on the effect of medical ozone administered through the intervertebral foramen epidural space on PHN. OBJECTIVE: This is a protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial to detect whether the injection of medical ozone via the intervertebral foramen epidural space can reduce the incidence of PHN. METHODS: After signing the written informed consent, patients meeting eligibility criteria will be allocated into the medical ozone group and the control group in a 1:1 ratio according to the randomized grouping information, with 35 patients in each group. Patients in both groups accepting the surgical procedure under CT guidance will be injected with 5 mL of therapeutic liquid. Subsequently, medical ozone (30 μg/mL, 5 mL in each segment) will be slowly administered in the medical ozone group versus a sham procedure in the control group. The primary outcome will be the incidence of PHN 3 months after the subsidence of rashes and vesicles. The secondary outcomes will be the times of injection treatment, complications during the surgical procedure, times of remedial analgesia with ultrasound-guided nerve block, numerical rating score and tactile sensation, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score, and the use of lidocaine cataplasms and oral analgesics before and after the surgical procedure under CT guidance. Data analyses between the 2 groups will be compared using the 2-sided Student t test or Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test based on the viability of the normality assumption, while chi-square or Fisher exact test will be used to compare the categorical data. RESULTS: This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Deyang People's Hospital on February 27, 2024 (2024-03-002-K01). The first patient was enrolled on May 14, 2024. As of November 2024, 25 participants have been enrolled out of 70 who received screening. The analysis of the efficacy and safety data is expected to be performed in about May 2025 after all the patients have enrolled, with the approximate publication of results by September 2025. CONCLUSIONS: If this exploratory trial proves effective, medical ozone administered via the intervertebral foramen epidural space may be utilized to aid in the recovery of the infected nerves and decrease the incidence of PHN in clinical settings. Positive outcomes will bolster the potential of employing medical ozone in the treatment of herpes zoster, thereby contributing to a reduction in the incidence of PHN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400084014; https://tinyurl.com/jk6p9hn2. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/68847.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".