MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412440291 · doi:10.58564/ma.v15i39.1842

Re-writing History in Jane Urquhart’s The Whirlpool

2025· article· en· W4412440291 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hussein Ali Abbas

Bibliographic record

Venueمداد الآداب · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtCalculus (dental)Art historyMathematics educationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jane Urquhart’s The Whirlpool addresses the overlooked contributions and sacrifices of Canadians in the War of 1812, which have been largely absent from colonial documents written by British and American historians. By focusing on the reality of war from a Canadian perspective, the novel offers a new and inclusive narrative of the war, one that challenges and falsifies the colonial record. This paper uses the theory of post-colonialism, which brings the colonizers and the colonized into a dispute over writing history, to investigate the events of the novel. This paper concludes that literary texts, such as novels, have the potential to construct alternative histories, providing a more comprehensive and representative account that counters the traditional colonial narrative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueمداد الآدابSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207