MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412444461 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3589296

Controlled Quantum Semantic Communication for Industrial CPS Networks

2025· article· en· W4412444461 on OpenAlex
Syed Muhammad Abuzar Rizvi, Uman Khalid, Symeon Chatzinotas, Trung Q. Duong, Hyundong Shin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsComputer scienceQuantumComputer networkTheoretical computer sciencePhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computing-intensive semantic communication emphasizes context, enabling the extraction of task-specific semantics from the source data and the reconstruction of the intended meaning at the destination. In industrial cyber-physical systems (CPSs), this approach can optimize automation processes while minimizing communication overhead with efficient bandwidth use in environments where machines, sensors, and controllers must communicate frequently. By integrating quantum communication with computing-empowered semantic methods, we can achieve unprecedented efficiency and security in task-oriented data transmission, effectively safeguarding against eavesdropping and other attacks. This paper presents a controlled quantum semantic communication (QSC) framework that leverages semantic extraction for anomaly detection in industrial CPS networks and employs controlled quantum communication to send the data securely with high semantic fidelity. A machine learning model extracts semantic information from images as the hull point data representing defective regions as pixel points. This data is then transmitted with high fidelity using quantum communication with controlled quantum state preparation. We use discrete- and continuous-variable states to simulate quantum binary phaseshift keying (BPSK) and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$M$</tex-math></inline-formula>-ary pulse position modulation (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$M$</tex-math></inline-formula>-PPM), respectively. At the receiver, these quantum states are measured using optimal quantum decision-making and converted back into the hull point data, thereby generating the anomaly map. This map is overlaid on a template image to highlight defect positions, which can be used for industrial quality control. Furthermore, we simulate the controlled QSC framework (BPSK and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$M$</tex-math></inline-formula>-PPM) across a diverse set of anomaly detection examples and evaluate the QSC performance in industrial CPS networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it