MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Emotion-Aware Recipe Generation Framework Using Distilbert and Large Language Models

2025· article· en· W4412446474 on OpenAlexaff
Roshaan JS, K Srisanjana, D Madhumitha, Shivanandham R.S, R. Subha, S. Ananthi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecipeComputer scienceNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional food recommendation systems often provide static meal suggestions based on previous user behavior, without the ability to develop tailored recipes based on current emotional states. This study presents an emotion-aware recipe generating framework that dynamically generates personalized culinary recommendations based on user-provided emotional inputs. The system uses a pre-trained DistilBERT model for sentiment classification and keyword-based food concept mapping to match emotions to relevant food categories. These inputs are subsequently processed by Falcon-7B-Instruct, a big language model, which uses rapid engineering to generate entire, structured recipes in plain language that include both ingredients and preparation instructions. Unlike existing methods that rely on curated food databases, our approach makes use of the generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to provide context-sensitive, emotionally meaningful recipe recommendations. The overarching goal is to improve user engagement and fulfilment by tailoring nutritional recommendations to individual emotional states, resulting in a novel junction of affective computing and customized nutrition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningFrench-language works237,207