MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412447107 · doi:10.1016/j.prime.2025.101074

Quantum space vector pulse width modulation for speed control of permanent magnet synchronous machines

2025· article· en· W4412447107 on OpenAlex
Nadjet Zioui, Aicha Mahmoudi, Mehdi Fazilat, Oumar Kone, Dermouche Reda, Mohamed Tadjine

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse-width modulationSpace vectorMagnetModulation (music)Permanent magnet synchronous generatorVector controlPhysicsPulse (music)Permanent magnet synchronous motorQuantumSpace vector modulationComputer scienceControl (management)Control theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringOpticsEngineeringAcousticsVoltageQuantum mechanicsInduction motor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for effective control strategies in electrical motor drives has resulted in significant advances in inverter modulation approaches, particularly for permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs). This study proposes a quantum-based strategy to improve energy efficiency, control precision, and system stability by developing quantum space vector pulse width modulation (QSVPWM) as an alternative technique to classical SVPWM for PMSM control. The proposed QSVPWM employs a quantum comparator implemented via a quantum subtractor for real numbers ranging from −100 % to +100 %. Trigonometric properties and the tensor product are combined to create a quantum sign function. The QSVPWM controller also incorporates quantum versions of classical logical gates such as and OR. The effectiveness of QSVPWM was assessed using MATLAB Simulink simulations, and its performance was compared with that of SVPWM under the same conditions. QSVPWM outperforms SVPWM in terms of control precision, oscillation reduction, and energy efficiency, reducing the root mean square speed error by 0.47 %, the d -axis current by 0.11 %, and the q-axis current by 0.59 %. Furthermore, a total harmonic distortion study revealed that QSVPWM reduces higher-order harmonics, thereby improving power quality and lowering energy losses. These enhancements help smooth control dynamics, minimize mechanical stress on components, and improve energy efficiency. In summary, QSVPWM outperforms traditional SVPWM, particularly for applications requiring precise control and greater energy savings in motor control systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.872

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it