MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412450116 · doi:10.1186/s12880-025-01823-w

Non-invasive liver fibrosis screening on CT images using radiomics

2025· article· en· W4412450116 on OpenAlex
Jay J. Yoo, Khashayar Namdar, S. Carey, Sandra E. Fischer, Chris McIntosh, Farzad Khalvati, Patrik Rogalla

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalVector InstitutePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreCanada Research ChairsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMedicineRadiomicsLogistic regressionRadiologyReceiver operating characteristicAsymptomaticCohortNeuroradiologyBiopsyUltrasoundNuclear medicineArtificial intelligenceInternal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To develop a radiomics machine learning model for detecting liver fibrosis on CT images of the liver. METHODS: With Ethics Board approval, 169 patients (68 women, 101 men; mean age, 51.2 years ± 14.7 [SD]) underwent an ultrasound-guided liver biopsy with simultaneous CT acquisitions without and following intravenous contrast material administration. Radiomic features were extracted from two regions of interest (ROIs) on the CT images, one placed at the biopsy site and another distant from the biopsy site. A development cohort, which was split further into training and validation cohorts across 100 trials, was used to determine the optimal combinations of contrast, normalization, machine learning model, and radiomic features for liver fibrosis detection based on their Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) on the validation cohort. The optimal combinations were then used to develop one final liver fibrosis model which was evaluated on a test cohort. RESULTS: When averaging the AUC across all combinations, non-contrast enhanced (NC) CT (AUC, 0.6100; 95% CI: 0.5897, 0.6303) outperformed contrast-enhanced CT (AUC, 0.5680; 95% CI: 0.5471, 0.5890). The most effective model was found to be a logistic regression model with input features of maximum, energy, kurtosis, skewness, and small area high gray level emphasis extracted from non-contrast enhanced NC CT normalized using Gamma correction with γ = 1.5 (AUC, 0.7833; 95% CI: 0.7821, 0.7845). CONCLUSIONS: The presented radiomics-based logistic regression model holds promise as a non-invasive detection tool for subclinical, asymptomatic liver fibrosis. The model may serve as an opportunistic liver fibrosis screening tool when operated in the background during routine CT examinations covering liver parenchyma. The final liver fibrosis detection model is made publicly available at: https://github.com/IMICSLab/RadiomicsLiverFibrosisDetection .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it