MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412450585 · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07129-z

Network analysis of the relationship between self-injury addiction, attachment, and anxiety in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury

2025· article· en· W4412450585 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lin Zhao, Shijian Wang, Jingya Li, Linghua Kong, Doudou Zheng, Ying Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyPsychologyClinical psychologyAddictionInjury preventionPoison controlSuicide preventionHuman factors and ergonomicsPsychiatrySelf-destructive behaviorMedicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has become increasingly prevalent, with its impact growing more severe among adolescents. Addictive NSSI typically manifests through higher frequencies, more severe injuries, and a broader range of affected body areas, potentially leading to trauma, disability, or even suicide. This study aims to explore the complex network relationships among adolescent attachment, anxiety, and NSSI addiction, offering new insights into the mechanisms underlying NSSI addiction in adolescents. METHODS: A total of 1169 adolescent patients with NSSI were enrolled. Demographic questionnaires, the Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory, the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, and the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children were administered for assessment. The complex network relationships among symptoms were analyzed using undirected network analysis and directed Bayesian network analysis, followed by causal inference. RESULTS: The core symptom nodes in the network model included four dimensions of anxiety symptoms: MASC2 (harm avoidance), MASC3 (social anxiety), MASC4 (separation anxiety), and MASC1 (physical symptoms), as well as Peer3 (peer alienation) related to attachment relationships. Undirected network analysis indicated that the key bridging nodes for NSSI addiction were Peer3 (peer alienation) and MASC1 (physical symptoms). Directed acyclic graph (DAG) analysis further confirmed this relationship, demonstrating that these two key bridging nodes directly influence NSSI addiction. Additionally, DAG analysis revealed that MASC3 (social anxiety) indirectly influences NSSI addiction by affecting Peer3 (peer alienation) and MASC1 (physical symptoms). CONCLUSION: Physical anxiety symptoms and peer alienation directly influence NSSI addiction among adolescents. Additionally, social anxiety indirectly influences NSSI addiction by affecting physical anxiety and peer alienation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychiatrySame topicMental Health Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207