MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412451880 · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110068

Sugar kelp application for sustainable potato production in Prince Edward Island: Impacts on soil, greenhouse gas emissions, and yield

2025· article· en· W4412451880 on OpenAlex
Raheleh Malekian, Travis J. Esau, Gurpreet Singh Selopal, K. S. Grewal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueField Crops Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsYield (engineering)KelpGreenhouse gasEnvironmental scienceSugarProduction (economics)AgronomySustainable productionGreenhouseSugar productionAgroforestryBiologyEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context Sugar kelp (SK) is a promising organic fertilizer with the potential to enhance crop yield, improve soil health, and reduce environmental impacts. However, its specific effects on soil quality, crop productivity, and particularly its role in climate change mitigation are still not well understood. Objectives This study evaluated the effects of SK, as seaweed-based organic fertilizer, and its combinations with IF on soil health, emissions of CO 2 and N 2 O, as well as CH 4 uptake, potato growth and yield during the 2023 and 2024 growing seasons in Prince Edward Island, Canada’s largest potato-producing province. Methods Field experiments were conducted over a two-year period (2023 and 2024). In 2023, treatments included: SK alone (2 tons ha - ¹), IF alone (meeting the full nitrogen (N) requirement), SK + IF (50 %-50 % N), and control (no fertilizer). In 2024, treatments were: IF alone, SK + IF (full N), SK + IF (80 % N), and control. The study measured soil organic matter, pH, P 2 O 5 , K 2 O, Ca, Mg, Cu, Zn, S, Mn, Fe, Na, Al, and NO 3 - , along with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and potato yield. Soil emission of CO 2 and N 2 O emissions, and soil CH 4 uptake were also measured using the Li-COR trace gas analyzer. Results Soil pH, organic matter, calcium, magnesium, and cation exchange capacity remained stable across treatments. Trace elements such as copper, iron, and zinc also showed minimal variation. However, the SK application significantly increased soil sodium concentrations in both years (p < 0.05). In 2024, nitrate (NO₃⁻-N) levels were significantly higher in the IF treatments than in the control. Cumulative CO₂ emissions and CH₄ uptake did not differ significantly among treatments in either year. IF-only treatments showed the highest cumulative N₂O emissions, whereas treatments combining SK with reduced IF significantly lowered cumulative N₂O emissions to levels similar to the control. These reduced-emission treatments maintained NDVI values and potato yields comparable to those of the full IF treatments, both of which outperformed the control. Conclusions These results suggest that combining SK with reduced IF can sustain potato yields while significantly lowering N₂O emissions. These findings highlight the potential of SK in sustainable fertilizer strategies; however, further long-term research and economic analysis are necessary to evaluate its broader viability in agriculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it