ADME-drug-likeness: enriching molecular foundation models via pharmacokinetics-guided multi-task learning for drug-likeness prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: Recent breakthroughs in AI-driven generative models enable the rapid design of extensive molecular libraries, creating an urgent need for fast and accurate drug-likeness evaluation. Traditional approaches, however, rely heavily on structural descriptors and overlook pharmacokinetic (PK) factors such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME). Furthermore, existing deep-learning models neglect the complex interdependencies among ADME tasks, which play a pivotal role in determining clinical viability. We introduce ADME-DL (drug likeness), a novel two-step pipeline that first enhances diverse range of molecular foundation models (MFMs) via sequential ADME multi-task learning. By enforcing an A→D→M→E flow-grounded in a data-driven task dependency analysis that aligns with established PK principles-our method more accurately encodes PK information into the learned embedding space. In Step 2, the resulting ADME-informed embeddings are leveraged for drug-likeness classification, distinguishing approved drugs from negative sets drawn from chemical libraries. Through comprehensive experiments, our sequential ADME multi-task learning achieves up to +2.4% improvement over state-of-the-art baselines, and enhancing performance across tested MFMs by up to +18.2%. Case studies with clinically annotated drugs validate that respecting the PK hierarchy produces more relevant predictions, reflecting drug discovery phases. These findings underscore the potential of ADME-DL to significantly enhance the early-stage filtering of candidate molecules, bridging the gap between purely structural screening methods and PK-aware modeling. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code for ADME-DL is available at https://github.com/eugenebang/ADME-DL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".