Latency Analysis of UAV-Assisted Vehicular Communications Using Personalized Federated Learning with Attention Mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted vehicular communications are investigated to minimize latency and maximize the utilization of available UAV battery power. As communication and cooperation among UAV and vehicles is frequently required, a viable approach is to reduce the transmission of redundant messages. However, when the sensor data captured by the varying number of vehicles is not independent and identically distributed (non-i.i.d.), this becomes challenging. Hence, in order to group the vehicles with similar data distributions in a cluster, we utilize federated learning (FL) based on an attention mechanism. We jointly maximize the UAV’s available battery power in each transmission window and minimize communication latency. The simulation experiments reveal that the proposed personalized FL approach achieves performance improvement compared with baseline FL approaches. Our model, trained on the V2X-Sim dataset, outperforms existing methods on key performance indicators. The proposed FL approach with an attention mechanism offers a reduction in communication latency by up to 35% and a significant reduction in computational complexity without degradation in performance. Specifically, we achieve an improvement of approximately 40% in UAV energy efficiency, 20% reduction in the communication overhead, and 15% minimization in sojourn time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".