Integrated Machine Learning Framework Combining Electrical Cycling and Material Features for Supercapacitor Health Forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability to predict capacity retention is critical for ensuring the long-term reliability of supercapacitors in energy storage systems. This study presents a comprehensive machine learning framework that integrates both electrical cycling data and experimentally derived material and structural features to forecast the degradation behavior of commercial supercapacitors. A total of seven supercapacitor samples were tested under various current and voltage conditions, resulting in over 70,000 charge–discharge cycles across three case studies. In addition to electrical measurements, detailed physical and material characterizations were performed, including electrode dimension analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). Three machine learning models, Linear Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), were trained using both cycler-only and combined cycler + material features. Results show that incorporating material features consistently improved prediction accuracy across all models. The MLP model exhibited the highest performance, achieving an R2 of 0.976 on the training set and 0.941 on unseen data. Feature importance analysis confirmed that material descriptors such as porosity, thermal stability, and electrode thickness significantly contributed to model performance. This study demonstrates that combining electrical and material data offers a more holistic and physically informed approach to supercapacitor health prediction. The framework developed here provides a practical foundation for accurate and robust lifetime forecasting of commercial energy storage devices, highlighting the critical role of material-level insights in enhancing model generalization and reliability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".