MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412457675 · doi:10.1111/vcp.70035

Method Comparison and Investigation of Interference Variables of a Hand‐Held Hemoglobinometer(<scp>HemoCue</scp> Hb 201<sup>+</sup>) in Cats

2025· article· en· W4412457675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Clinical Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersOVC Pet Trust
KeywordsMedicineAzotemiaCATSLeukocytosisAnemiaIntraclass correlationLimits of agreementHemoglobinVenipunctureInternal medicineGastroenterologyVenous bloodHematocritNuclear medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Regular blood sampling to monitor RBC mass in anemic cats can exacerbate anemia. Laboratory‐based reporting can delay clinical decisions. A hand‐held hemoglobinometer, HemoCue Hb 201 + (HC‐201), requires only one drop of blood (10 μL) and provides results within 1 min. Objectives This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the utility of HC‐201 in cats and investigate the impact of potential interferents on its performance. Methods One hundred and fifty‐four venous blood samples in EDTA from 93 cats were analyzed. Hemoglobin concentration was measured once using an ADVIA 2120 analyzer and compared to the mean of 2–3 replicate measurements from an HC‐201. Agreement and systematic bias between HC‐201 and ADVIA results, along with precision between HC‐201 replicates, were assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, non‐parametric Bland–Altman, Passing‐Bablok regression, and intraclass correlation coefficient. The performance of HC‐201 in the presence of anemia, leukocytosis, azotemia, lipemia, icterus, hemolysis, and peripheral versus jugular venipunctures was assessed using Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests. Results Passing‐Bablok analysis revealed a significant constant bias (intercept = −2.242, 95% CI: −4.042 to −0.667) but no significant proportional bias (slope = 1.015, 95% CI: 1.000–1.032). HC‐201 demonstrated excellent agreement ( ρ c = 0.989) and precision (ICC = 0.997) with a median bias of −0.67 g/L ( p = 0.001). The total observed error was 3.02%, within the allowable limits defined by international standards. Neither anemia, leukocytosis, azotemia, lipemia, nor venipuncture site influenced HC‐201 measurements. Samples with icterus and hemolysis were insufficient in number for statistical comparison. Conclusions This preliminary study indicates that HC‐201 offers reliable point‐of‐care monitoring for hemoglobin concentration in cats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it