MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412464044 · doi:10.1002/mp.17979

Microdosimetry calculations in situ for clinically relevant photon sources and their correlation with the early DNA damage response

2025· article· en· W4412464044 on OpenAlexafffund
Mirta Dumančić, Jonathan Kalinowski, Víctor D. Díaz-Martínez, Joanna Li, Behnaz Behmand, Joseph M. DeCunha, Shirin A. Enger

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersInstitut TransMedTechMEDTEQ+Canada Research ChairsAlphaTau MedicalMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsPhotonLinear particle acceleratorDosimetryMonte Carlo methodPhysicsRelative biological effectivenessBrachytherapyNuclear medicinePhoton energyAbsorbed doseIrradiationOpticsNuclear physicsRadiation therapyBeam (structure)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Radiobiological data suggests variations in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) between clinically used photon‐based sources. A microdosimetric formalism using Monte Carlo (MC) methods can mechanistically describe the photon RBE. Experimentally derived RBE based on DNA double‐strand breaks () has been shown to scale with the microdosimetry quantity dose‐mean lineal energy (). Purpose To calculate microdosimetric spectra for clinically relevant photon sources, spanning from soft x‐rays produced by a 50 kVp x‐ray source through various brachytherapy sources up to a 6 MV medical linac. Furthermore, we investigated the correlation between and of different photon sources. Methods Photon sources simulated include low‐energy x‐rays (50 kVp), orthovoltage x‐rays (225 kVp), high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy sources ( 75 Se, 192 Ir and 60 Co), and a 6 MV medical linac. Secondary electron spectra at the cellular level were calculated for in vitro cell irradiation setups using Geant4 MC‐based packages, RapidBrachyMCTPS and RapidExternalBeam. The obtained spectra were used in MicroDose, a microdosimetry simulation software, to obtain microdosimetric quantities, including single‐event lineal energy () and specific energy () spectra, and dose‐mean and frequency‐mean quantities (, , , ). Uniform spherical targets (1–14 radius) and realistic HeLa and PC3 cell nucleus models were simulated using cell size data obtained from literature and nuclei size data from confocal microscopy imaging. Radiobiological experiments using foci quantified DNA double‐strand breaks for HeLa and PC3 cells after irradiations with 50 and 225 kVp, 192 Ir, and 6 MV linac, and was determined using 225 kVp as the reference. Results The calculated () is within the 3.5–1.2 keV/ range (1.8–0.2 keV/) for 1 simulated target size between the lowest energy 50 kVp x‐ray source and the highest energy 6 MV linac source, respectively. For the HeLa and PC3 cell nuclei models based on microscopy data, () spans from 1.6 to 0.6 keV/ (0.7 to 0.2 keV/). When compared between different target sizes, () ranges from 3.5 to 1.0 (1.8–0.4) keV/ between 1 and 10 radius targets for the 50 kVp x‐ray source. A smaller change is observed for 6 MV linac, ranging from 1.2 to 0.5 keV/ and 0.23 to 0.22 keV/ for and , respectively. For the simulated 75 Se source currently under investigation, the calculated values are 11%–24% higher relative to those of 192 Ir in the range of target sizes between 1 and 14 in radius. for HeLa cells was 1.40.7 for 50 kVp x‐rays, 0.50.2 for 192 Ir, and 0.70.4 for 6 MV linac irradiations. For PC3 cells, was 1.30.6, 0.80.4 and 0.50.3 for 50 kVp, 192 Ir and 6 MV linac, respectively. Measured values are consistent with ratios of the corresponding photon sources for HeLa and PC3 nucleus models. Conclusions Microdosimetric spectra strongly depend on the simulated energy of photon sources and target size, with and decreasing by a factor of 2–3 between diagnostic 50 kVp and 6 MV therapeutic x‐rays for target sizes from 1–14 in radius. The early damage indicates this stochastic change in energy density between various photon sources as the yields of foci per nucleus scale with of the source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207