MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412465187 · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-26016

Biofilm Formation in Dairy: A Food Safety Concern—Insights into the prevalence of Pseudomonadota and yeasts on milking system surface biofilms

2025· review· en· W4412465187 on OpenAlex
Mérilie Gagnon, Juan de Toro‐Martín, Gisèle LaPointe, Évelyne Guévremont, Simon Dufour, Denis Roy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint HyacintheUniversity of GuelphUniversité Laval
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité LavalNovalaitUniversité de MontréalDairy Farmers of OntarioDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsMilkingBiofilmMicrobiologyBiologyFood scienceAnimal scienceBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biofilms pose major challenges to milk quality and safety, yet their composition in the dairy environment remains under-characterized. This study investigated the prevalence and composition of biofilms on milking system surfaces in commercial dairy farms, focusing on Pseudomonadota, a dominant phylum in raw milk. We sampled bulk tank raw milk (BTRM), tap water, and milking equipment surfaces after cleaning from 20 dairy farms in Québec, Canada, using S1 milk agar, specifically designed to target Pseudomonadota through a culturomics approach. A total of 474 colonies were selected and identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Results demonstrated the presence of multispecies biofilms, within the phylum of Pseudomonadota, including potential spoilage and pathogenic bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Furthermore, the study revealed a significant presence of yeasts (42% of the isolates), predominantly Candida parapsilosis. Biofilms were predominantly detected in milk pipelines and milking machines (milk pipeline: 5.42 log gene copy number/swab; milking machine: 5.16 log gene copy number/swab), with greater bacterial loads quantified by quantitative PCR in fall than spring or summer. Partial least squares discriminant analysis revealed that the microbial composition of biofilms differed from that of BTRM (classification error rate: 0.23 and area under the curve: 0.95), although several species were shared, such as Candida parapsilosis and P. aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. Tap water was not identified as a major contamination source of Pseudomonadota for dairy biofilms as only 2 species were shared across water, BTRM, and biofilm samples (Pantoea agglomerans and Serratia liquefaciens). The presence of these biofilms, harboring potentially pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms, poses a challenge to milk quality and safety. These findings provide data on the diversity of culturable Pseudomonadota and yeasts in biofilms on dairy farms and highlight the need for improved sanitation practices to mitigate microbial contamination in milk production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it