MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modèle clinique des douleurs antérieures du genou : structure versus fonction

2025· article· fr· W4412470301 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe M. Tscholl, Malek Belhedi, Morgan Gauthier, Maximilian Schindler

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Médicale Suisse · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anterior knee pain, which is common among both athletes and non-athletes, can have various underlying causes. This article proposes an integrative diagnostic model that identifies painful structures and associated functional and structural factors. Pain is classified based on its origin, which enables targeted treatment, whether conservative, medical, or surgical. The therapeutic approach must consider both the function and specific characteristics of the affected tissues to promote a patient-centered treatment plan. This analysis emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive clinical assessment for effective management of anterior knee pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Médicale SuisseSame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207