INTERPRETASI LEBENSWELT SENIMAN SUNARYO OLEH MASYARAKAT DALAM WOT BATU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wot Batu merupakan karya seni instalasi dalam skala ruang yang diciptakan oleh Sunaryo pada tahun 2015 di Ciburial, Bandung. Konsep Lebenswelt (dunia kehidupan), sebagaimana dikemukakan oleh Edmund Husserl, hadir dalam karya ini melalui fenomena lingkungan sekitar, intuisi, emosi, serta pengalaman dan ingatan pribadi Sunaryo. Lebenswelt tersebut diwujudkan dalam suasana, bentuk, tekstur batu, dan tapak Wot Batu, yang merefleksikan pandangan pribadi dan spiritualitas Sunaryo. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif-analitis untuk memahami bagaimana makna Lebenswelt dalam Wot Batu diterima oleh masyarakat. Data dikumpulkan melalui kajian literatur untuk memahami latar belakang Sunaryo serta observasi langsung terhadap elemen fisik Wot Batu. Wawancara mendalam dilakukan dengan staf dan pengunjung guna menggali perspektif mereka. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pengalaman spiritual Sunaryo dalam Wot Batu dapat terbaca oleh orang lain, meskipun dengan tingkat pemahaman yang berbeda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".