MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412478325 · doi:10.4108/eettti.9442

Efficient Machine Learning for Wi-Fi CSI-based Human Activity Recognition Using Fast Monte Carlo based Feature Extraction

2025· article· en· W4412478325 on OpenAlexaff
Emelia Logah

Bibliographic record

VenueEAI Endorsed Transactions on Tourism Technology and Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMonte Carlo methodFeature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Extraction (chemistry)Machine learningMathematicsChemistryStatisticsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-dimensional doppler data extracted from Wi-Fi channel state information (CSI) offers distinctive velocity and time patterns that are useful for human activity recognition (HAR), but its scale poses significant challenges for real-time inference and deployment on resource-constrained devices. This work proposes an efficient, fast monte carlo (MC) feature selection framework based on the frieze-kannanvempala (FKV) algorithm and coefficient estimation to address this bottleneck. The CSI is preprocessed, and doppler traces are computed to encode the velocity and direction of distinct activities. Afterwards, we perform FKV to decompose the doppler data, and the coefficient of the resulting singular vectors is estimated. Using rejection sampling, the topmost features are selected on the basis of their weights, thereby reducing the size of our features. The method identifies a compact set of velocity-time features that preserve critical motion information while significantly reducing computational overhead. The experimental evaluations demonstrated that the decision tree classifier achieved the highest precision at 99.8%, followed by convolutional neural networks (CNN) 96%, the hybrid CNN-long-short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) achieved 87%, while the LSTM model lagged at 53%. These results demonstrated that the integration of fast MC-based feature selection significantly reduced computational overhead without sacrificing classification performance, making it suitable for scalable and real-time HAR applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEAI Endorsed Transactions on Tourism Technology and IntelligenceSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207