Influence of Polyester and Denim Microfibers on the Treatment and Formation of Aerobic Granules in Sequencing Batch Reactors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the effects of polyester and denim microfibers (MFs) on aerobic granular sludge (AGS) over a 42-day period. Treatment performance, granulation, and microbial community changes were assessed at 0, 10, 70, 210, and 1500 MFs/L. Reactors with 70 MFs/L achieved rapid granulation and showed improved settling by day 9, while 0 and 10 MFs/L reactors showed delayed granule formation, which was likely due to limited nucleation and weaker shear conditions. Severe clogging and frequent maintenance occurred at 1500 MFs/L. Despite > 98% MF removal in all reactors, treatment performance declined at higher MF loads. Nitrogen removal dropped from 93% to 68%. Phosphate removal slightly increased in reactors with no or low microfiber loads (96–99%), declined in reactors with 70 or 210 MFs/L (92–91%, 89–88%), and dropped significantly in the reactor with1500 MFs/L (86–70%, p < 0.05). COD removal declined with increasing MF load. Paracoccus (denitrifiers) dominated low-MF reactors; Acinetobacter (associated with complex organic degradation) and Nitrospira (nitrite-oxidizing genus) were enriched at 1500 MFs/L. Performance decline likely stemmed from nutrient transport blockage and toxic leachates, highlighting the potential threat of MFs to wastewater treatment and the need for upstream MF control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".