MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412487756 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0327778

MDMA-assisted therapy and current treatment options for chronic, treatment-resistant, moderate or higher severity post-traumatic stress disorder: Systematic literature review

2025· review· en· W4412487756 on OpenAlexaff
Filip Stanicic, Vladimir Zah, Dimitrije Grbic, Djurdja Vukicevic, Debra de Angelo

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychedelics and Drug Studies
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMDMAMedicinePlaceboRandomized controlled trialPsychiatryTraumatic stressInternal medicineBeck Depression InventoryAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) is currently being evaluated for treatment of patients with moderate or higher severity post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive summary of investigational MDMA-AT and current treatments for PTSD. METHODS: A search was conducted in PubMed and Embase (December 20, 2023). Populations included adults with chronic, treatment-resistant, moderate or higher severity PTSD. Interventions were MDMA-AT and comparators based on PTSD treatment guidelines. The primary outcome of interest was the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score. Other outcomes observed were Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and loss of diagnosis (LOD). Studies observing chronic, moderate or higher severity treatment-resistant PTSD in adults were included. Only randomized controlled trials published in English were considered. The NICE quality appraisal checklist was used to assess risk of bias in included studies. We provided qualitative synthesis of evidence presented in extraction tables. RESULTS: Overall, 77 studies were included. Phase II/III trials consistently reported significantly greater CAPS improvement with MDMA-AT vs. placebo with therapy (PT) after two or three interventional sessions. Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment. FDA-approved and off-label medications used for PTSD treatment did not yield a consistently greater CAPS decrease vs. control arms across trials. Significant CAPS improvement was consistently observed in venlafaxine ER, olanzapine, propranolol (with traumatic memory reactivation), nefazodone, and nabilone placebo-controlled trials. Most psychotherapy trials lacked between-group statistical assessments. Significant CAPS decrease compared to the waitlist was reported for cognitive therapy (CT), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE), and group cognitive exposure therapy. CAPS improvement was persistent for CPT and PE in long-term follow up (mean duration 6.2 years). MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). The percentage of participants with LOD after two or three active-dose MDMA-AT sessions ranged from 41.7-83.3%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests current treatments for PTSD are associated with heterogeneous evidence and the majority do not demonstrate sustained effects. Results from MDMA-AT showed consistent improvements in CAPS, BDI and LOD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicPsychedelics and Drug StudiesFrench-language works237,207