MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412487784 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006789

Sex- and Age-Related Differences in Post-Burn Pathophysiology

2025· article· en· W4412487784 on OpenAlexaff
Diana Julia Tedesco, Maria Fernanda Hutter, Fadi Khalaf, Gregory R. Pond, Marc G. Jeschke

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePathophysiologyInternal medicineYoung adultCohortBurn injuryOdds ratioCohort studyPhysiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Sex and its effects on outcomes after burn are controversially discussed. In particular, the impact of sex on physiologic responses post-burn remains largely unknown. To bridge this knowledge gap, this study aimed to explore outcomes and the underlying pathophysiological responses in males and females across different age groups. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary burn center. PATIENTS: Adult burn patients (≥ 18 yr) admitted with an acute burn injury. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included all patients (≥ 18 yr) admitted with acute burn injuries between 2006 and 2021. Patients were stratified based on sex assigned at birth and age group: adult (< 60 yr) vs. older adult (≥ 60 yr). Clinical laboratory measures and inflammatory markers were compared throughout hospitalization between male and female burn patients within each age group. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, in-hospital complications, organ biomarkers, and inflammatory cytokine responses. A total of 2321 patients were included. Adult females experienced greater mortality (1% vs. 2%; p < 0.05) and increased skin graft loss (5% vs. 9%; p < 0.05) compared with their male counterparts. Furthermore, among adults, female sex was an independent predictor of mortality in a multivariate model (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3-9.6; p < 0.05). Adult females showed acute decreases in pro-inflammatory cytokines (interferon-γ, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α; p < 0.05). Interestingly, no differences in mortality or complications were observed between older adult males and females. Older adult males and females also showed similar inflammatory responses and limited differences in organ function. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort study, we observed that adult females show increased mortality compared with their male counterparts. Differences in inflammatory responses underlie this observation, contributing to the observed poor outcomes. Importantly, sex differences in post-burn responses appear to diminish with age, highlighting the importance of deepening our understanding of the underlying physiologic mechanisms to optimize patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicBurn Injury Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207