MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412490859 · doi:10.1002/ijgo.70379

Impact of short maternal height on preterm birth: A retrospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4412490859 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Joan Crane, Phil Murphy, Donnette O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health ResearchMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersJaneway Children's Hospital Foundation
KeywordsMedicineOverweightOdds ratioBody mass indexConfidence intervalObstetricsBirth weightRetrospective cohort studyCohort studyMass indexPregnancyDemographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of short maternal height on preterm birth by different body mass index (BMI) classes and type of preterm birth. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated women with singleton pregnancies delivering from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Eastern Zone of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Maternal height was divided into three groups: <25% (short), 25%-75% (average), and >75% (tall). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine whether short height independently predicted preterm birth before 37 weeks, stratified by BMI class. Subgroup analyses were performed for spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. RESULTS: Of 16 023 pregnancies assessed, 1245 (7.8%) were associated with preterm birth. Among all BMI categories combined, short height independently predicted preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 1.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-1.61], P < 0.001). In stratified analyses, short height independently predicted preterm birth among individuals with normal BMI (OR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.16-2.00], P = 0.002), overweight BMI (OR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.03-2.08], P = 0.010), and obese BMI (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.002-1.72], P = 0.048). In subgroup analyses, short height independently predicted spontaneous preterm birth among those with a normal BMI (OR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.15-2.17], P = 0.005) but not those in higher BMI categories. Short height independently predicted indicated preterm birth among those overweight or obese (OR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.18-2.16], P = 0.002) but not in those with a normal BMI. CONCLUSION: The association between short maternal height and preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation varies by type of preterm birth (spontaneous or indicated) and BMI class. Among women with a normal BMI, short maternal height is associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Among women who are overweight or obese, short maternal height is associated with an increased risk of indicated preterm birth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207